|
By Pete Stidman
News Editor
A Blue Hill Avenue dry cleaner may be held
responsible for the release of a toxic chemical
called perchloroethylene into the groundwater
underneath the construction site of the new
Mattapan Library. The chemical is a suspected
carcinogen and worse in large quantities, but city
officials said the site poses no imminent health
hazard to residents and will not delay the
library's construction.
It might, however, have to be cleaned up.
Boulevard Cleaners, uphill from the library at
1328 Blue Hill, has been given a 'notice of
responsibility' for the contamination, and was
ordered to hire a professional to determine if the
chemical originated from the shop. Donald Maggioli,
a licensed site professional (LSP) hired by the
city, said he ran into Boulevard's LSP, who told
him that he had not found any evidence of a current
leak on the premises.
"From what I see, this is from years before,"
said Boulevard owner Peter Papadogiannis. "They
used different machines before, they had just
replaced them when I bought the place five years
ago. If somebody else spilled it before, why should
I responsible?"
But according to the Department of Environmental
Protection, which would enforce any decision
against Papadogiannnis, the liability for clean-up
costs can be the current or the former owner's. Who
will pay is determined by the DEP, case-by-case.
"If you are putting cash down to buy property or a
business, you should also be doing due diligence to
check out the property," said DEP spokesperson Joe
Ferson.
In the amounts it has been found in, the perc,
as it is called for short, is not harmful to
humans. If it reached air, it could be inhaled, but
the release is deep underground and the library's
foundation will be a slab type, difficult to
penetrate.
Cleaning up the spill will not be as simple as
trucking a few loads of dirt away. Unlike
hydrocarbons and other chemicals, perc is heavier
than water. When it percolates down into the
groundwater, it tends to keep sinking until it
reaches bedrock.
"To clean up the perc is extremely difficult,
because it's going down deep," Maggioli told a
meeting of abutters at the Mildred Avenue Community
Center last Thursday. But if the site is tested
again and falls within minimum guidelines for
groundwater, he said, it may not have to be cleaned
up. "It's not a significant release. The highest
number we've found is 900 parts per billion." The
legal limit, he said, is 50 parts per billion.
Maggioli also found byproducts of perc that had
been chemically broken down by the soil.
"If that library had not come up, nobody would
have known what was happening around here," said
Bishop Hezron Farrell of the Glad Tidings
Pentecostal Assembly, a nearby church. "We wanted
that lot, but the city took it over. It was God
where we're concerned, because we would not be able
to produce that kind of money."
Before the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act of 1983, perc was not considered a hazardous
chemical, legally. Dry cleaning machines often
leaked the chemical, and many shop owners disposed
of it simply by tossing it in their dumpster.
Because of this history, many contaminated areas
have been found throughout the city, some much
worse than the Mattapan site. Officials suspect
many more are still undiscovered.
"We're considering looking at dry cleaning
throughout the whole city and the DEP is looking at
them in the whole state," said John Shea, director
of Boston's Environmental Hazards Program.
Currently, discoveries of perc are only
discovered through large new construction projects
- such as the Mattapan Library - which require soil
and groundwater inspections or when someone takes
out a bank loan to buy a business. The banks often
require site inspection to insure against potential
liabilities such as the one faced by Boulevard
Cleaners.
In addition to the groundwater threat, perc can
be a workplace hazard that causes dizziness,
headaches and even unconsciousness and death in
high concentrations. Some anti-perc activists say
consumers could also be risking cancer, just by
inhaling fumes off their recently dry-cleaned suits
and evening gowns.
A federal law is phasing out the use of perc at
dry cleaners in apartment buildings by 2020, and
California is phasing out its use completely by
2023. In Massachusetts the laws are still lax by
comparison. The DEP requires dry-cleaners to
self-report using detailed surveys, and then audits
or randomly checks up on them. New machines using
perc require seals and systems to dispose of the
used chemical, and as a result perc use has
dropped. In 1997, when DEP began taking surveys,
dry cleaners statewide reported using 111,836
gallons. In 2005, they used only 50,720.
Back
to Reporter Home Page
|