Dear Reporter:

We have seen the recent media coverage and commentary regarding Dorchester and the perceived conflict between 'new' and 'old' residents. By dividing ourselves by longevity, class, race or other social constructs we hurt ourselves.

Anyone who has moved here over the past twenty years missed the pain and suffering Boston inflicted upon itself during the racial crisis of the 1970s. Conversely, long-time residents fail to recognize that many living here today do not know the fear and uncertainty that paralyzed this community. This gap in understanding reveals itself in almost every controversial civic issue.

It is easy to see why new residents become resentful when they see longer-tenured neighbors operate the political system to their advantage. Conversely, long-term residents react with derision and name calling when newer residents try to raise community standards.

Considering our history, the current "split" between the recent wave of middle class residents from the South End, South Boston, Jamaica Plain and the suburbs and long-term residents is probably one of the smaller obstacles Dorchester has taken on.

Tension among residents has been part of Dorchester for much of its existence. The first settlers from the Mary and John split into two communities soon after landing here in 1630. Later that century, Catholics were deemed "terrorists" by Puritan ministers. "No Irish Need Apply" could well have been invented by Dorchester Yankees in the 19th century. Dorchester ceded South Boston (then Dorchester Heights) in a vain effort to keep the Irish out. Add to our history the upheaval around racial issues during the 1970s for the continuation of a painful legacy.

Too often our civic leaders add to this legacy by stoking familiar fears. When our political leaders take sides and cast aspersions about potential "threats" to our community they thwart the opportunity for positive influence. Small wonder court has been chosen as a venue to address civic issues. Who can fault someone looking for a fair hearing?

Our common ground is that we live here. We should recognize that anyone who takes an interest in civic affairs has community interests at heart. We all live in the United States with the same rights and responsibilities. Sharing our concerns and solutions can be very powerful. When we listen respectfully to each other's point of view we find that Dorchester is one of the richest communities in Massachusetts. Instead, we are often victims of our own low expectations.

Wouldn't it be better if the advance of fair community standards could be entrusted to our political and community leaders? Wouldn't it be better if we could listen to others with compassion? Wouldn't it be better if we could hear what we say and how it may hurt our neighbor? The recent media coverage is giving us an opportunity to bring our shared values to light instead of harping on our differences. Let's begin to think about that opportunity.

Peace

Phil Lindsay
Mather Street