All Contents © Copyright 2003, Boston Neighborhood News, Inc.
Community Comment
The News This Week from Dorchester
July 24, 2003
City's Appointed "Impact Advisory Groups" Increase Resident Input into Projects

To the Editor:

I read with interest Eoin Cannon's article "Pols Resist City's IAG Project Review Process" (July 10, 2003). Development review in Boston is one of the most publicly oriented processes in the country. Every year, the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) hosts thousands of meetings throughout Boston's neighborhoods to solicit public comment on proposed projects. We provide public comment periods after every developer submission, and we incorporate neighborhood responses into the public record. We offer public hearings before important votes of the BRA Board. We encourage developers to work with elected officials and neighborhood organizations on issues of concern. Boston has more public involvement with more community influence at more stages of development than any other major urban area in the U.S. An example of how we go further to solicit public input is through the creation of the Impact Advisory Group (IAG).

The IAG process is an addition to the existing development review guidelines outlined in the Boston Zoning Code. While the Code sets forth official procedures and timelines for accommodating general public input, the BRA, working with Mayor Thomas M. Menino, created IAGs to ensure that local communities have a voice at every stage of the review process. IAG members are appointed by local elected officials and the mayor and include neighborhood residents and business and community organization representatives. An IAG does not replace any part of the public process, but instead offers an opportunity for community members to join the BRA in procedural aspects of Article 80 &emdash; such as the public agency scoping session or the drafting of the cooperation agreement &emdash; where public participation was previously unlikely. The IAG increases the BRA's sensitivity to community concerns at every step of the review process.

Overseeing development requires a careful balance between public and private property rights. The BRA's role is to mediate between developer and community to ensure that the resulting development is good for all. We take that responsibility very seriously. Our staff of planners, project managers, urban designers, and lawyers &emdash; all of whom are themselves Boston residents &emdash; must carefully cull issues of conflict to find areas of agreement. The BRA must weigh a broad range of input from the community, elected officials, and the IAG. Involving the widest range of participants in the development dialogue gives us the confidence in the continued vitality of Boston and its vibrant neighborhoods.

Mark Maloney

Director

Boston Redevelopment Authority

 

 

 

     Let Us Know What You Think!

What do you think? Why not write your own letter to the editor?
You can e-mail it to the Reporter newsroom at
letters@dotnews.com. The Reporter will only publish letters that are signed- and include a daytime phone number for verification.

 

Other recent commentaries from our neighbors:

Morrissey Lane Change Is Unfair, Arbitrary 7.17.03

Small Changes Have Big Impacts
on Dot's Traffic Snarls 7.10.03

Sermons Off The Mount 7.2.03

Why I Bike to Work 6.19.03

A Vision for Edward Everett Square 6.12.03

Rivers' Ignorant Comments Prove HeIs Out of Touch 6.5.03


UMass-Boston and Dorchester: Where Do We Go from Here? 5.29.03

An Easy Equation: Senate Should Act Now to Save Home Health Care 05.22.03

Romney's Endless War is Aimed at Landing Him in the White House 05.15.03

Motherhood Transformation Brings Unexpected Joy- 5.08.03

Dorms Undermine UMass Boston's Original Mission-4.17.03

Easter: When Finished Isn't Finished 04.10.03

Weapon of Mass Distraction Opens Huge Hole for Profiteers 04.03.03

But Will It Make Us Safer? 3.20.03

Bulger Defends UMass Against Romney's "Attack on Higher Education" 3.13.03

Dorchester Hurts Itself with Divide Among Old, New Residents 3.6.03

UMass Chancellor Fails to Convince One Reader on Dorms 2.26.03

Money Woes Could Strangle Classroom Progress 2.20.03

The Faith Based Initiative as a Great Smoke Screen 2.13.03

Unilateral Strike Against Iraq Remains Unjustified 1.30.03 

Sen. Hart: Gathering Fiscal Storm Presents Challenges for Neighborhood 1.23.03

A Costly Move 1.16.03

Conley Lays Out Vision for District Attorney's Office 1.9.03

"Fairness schmairness" Press, Pundits Lose Balance on Bulger Story 12.12.02

Voice of the Vulnerable 12.5.02

Is President's Bill Really About Homeland Security? 11.21.01
Bush, Kennedy on War Prospects with Iraq 11.7.02

Putting Health of Murphy School Kids, Teachers First 10.31.02

Murphy, A Right, Honorable Gentleman 10.24.02

Making Prevention, Partnerships a Priority in D.A.'s Office 10.17.02

Why I'm Voting for Carla Howell for Governor 10.3.02

Dedicated Few Keep Democracy Alive As Media Tunes Out 9.26.02

The Skirmish 9.19.02

What's In a Name? Narrow-Minded Media Deepens Dot's Tricky Identity Crisis 9.12.02

Getting Off on the Right Foot This School Year 9.5.02

Great Son of Dorchester Deserves Hall of Fame Nod 8.29.02

A Piece of Candy for a Janitor's Kid 8.22.02

Boston Must Change the Way It Treats Stray Animals 8.15.02

Brian Honan's Symphony Cut Way Too Short 8.8.02

Reforms Needed to Keep Released Criminals from Offending Again 8.1.02

St. Ambrose Parent Upset by Lack of Notice,Mismanagement 7.25.02

Crime-Fighters' Cooperation Still Key to the 'Boston Miracle' 7.18.02

At 98, Susan Walsh Still'Guiding Force' for Her Family 7.03.02

Bush Administration Takes Ugly Anti-Immigrant Turn in Policy Towards Haitians 7.03.02

 

Back to the Reporter Home Page