|
By Pete Stidman
News Editor
Last year, hopeful developers painted dramatic
pictures of the future over the abandoned Cote Ford
dealership on Cummins Highway, but the neighborhood
opposed those plans on density concerns, shrinking
them from 165 units to 65 and then asking for less.
On Friday, the Woodhaven Street Association met
with the intention of creating a vision of what
they would like to see, but were constantly
interrupted by fundamental questions they could not
answer.
Who owns it? How polluted is it? And how much
tax is owed on it? None of those facts could be
answered at the time of the meeting, even though
representatives of the mayor's office and the
Boston Redevelopment Authority sat in the room
along with at-Large City Councillor Michael
Flaherty.
Many of the answers are indeed complicated.
The property, dormant for decades, once belonged
to Richard Ruben, but was foreclosed upon and sold
to Cummins Development LLC in 2001. Cummins
Development is controlled by Webster Engineering,
whose principal agent is Theodore Webster Jr.
Webster Engineering, a minority-owned construction
contractor, went out of business last year and a
contact number for the company or its agent can't
be found. The Community Builders, which proposed
development schemes to the community last summer,
apparently has an option to buy the property if a
future iteration of its plans are accepted by the
community.
"We still have site control," said TCB director
of development Felicia Jacques. "I think were
looking at something that will complement the
larger planning that's going on in the city."
Jacques referred specifically to the Mattapan
Economic Development Initiative, a Boston
Redevelopment Authority planning charette for
revitalizing Mattapan Square, Morton Street and the
area. She would not give any timeline for any
meeting, planning stage or other next step toward
conceiving a new plan for the Cote Ford site.
As to the pollution on the site, all the
releases on the site are hydrocarbons or oil
products, what one would expect from a car lot. The
Department of Environmental Protection closed out
the site in 2002, meaning it has been largely
cleaned up and the DEP considers it safe even for
residential use. But if construction crews start
digging up the soil, they would have to take
precautions for worker safety. Just how much extra
it would cost a developer to mitigate the
contamination is variable. According to DEP
spokesperson Joe Ferson, it would depend on the
scale and type of construction involved.
More onerous to potential developers than the
environmental concerns is a giant tax bill that the
previous owner stacked up, in the area of $1.6
million for all the various lots in the area owned
by Cummins Development. Paying that would be a
requirement for any project to go there, and the
bill keeps getting larger every year.
Kaigler's plans to create a new vision didn't
get too far. Only "Mixed-Use," "Playground," and
"Green Space" were written on the big blank sheet
of paper stuck to the wall by the end of the
meeting. Jacques said TCB would be open to hearing
from them, and definitely plans to engage with them
when a new plan is eminent. "We welcome their phone
calls and participation," she said.
Councillor Flaherty, who took interest in the
matter, said he would like to see the true owner
come forward.
"The lawful owner should come forward, introduce
himself to the community, pay any outstanding taxes
and liabilities," Flaherty said. "They should work
with the community on the development of the
site."
Back
to Reporter Home Page
|