|
March 18, 2008
Transcript
The following is the text as prepared for
delivery of Senator Barack Obama's speech on race
in Philadelphia, as provided by his presidential
campaign.
"We the people, in order to form a more
perfect union."
Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a
hall that still stands across the street, a group
of men gathered and, with these simple words,
launched America's improbable experiment in
democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and
patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape
tyranny and persecution finally made real their
declaration of independence at a Philadelphia
convention that lasted through the spring of
1787.
The document they produced was eventually
signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by
this nation's original sin of slavery, a question
that divided the colonies and brought the
convention to a stalemate until the founders chose
to allow the slave trade to continue for at least
twenty more years, and to leave any final
resolution to future generations.
Of course, the answer to the slavery
question was already embedded within our
Constitution &endash; a Constitution that had at is
very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the
law; a Constitution that promised its people
liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and
shouldbe perfected over time.
And yet words on a parchment would not be
enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide
men and women of every color and creed their full
rights and obligations as citizens of the United
States. What would be needed were Americans in
successive generations who were willing to do their
part &endash; through protests and struggle, on the
streets and in the courts, through a civil war and
civil disobedience and always at great risk - to
narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals
and the reality of their time.
This was one of the tasks we set forth at the
beginning of this campaign &endash; to continue the
long march of those who came before us, a march for
a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and
more prosperous America. I chose to run for the
presidency at this moment in history because I
believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges
of our time unless we solve them together &endash;
unless we perfect our union by understanding that
we may have different stories, but we hold common
hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not
have come from the same place, but we all want to
move in the same direction &endash; towards a
better future for our children and our
grandchildren.
This belief comes from my unyielding faith in
the decency and generosity of the American people.
But it also comes from my own American story.
I am the son of a black man from Kenya and
a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the
help of a white grandfather who survived a
Depression to serve in Patton's Army during World
War II and a white grandmother who worked on a
bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he
was overseas. I've gone to some of the best schools
in America and lived in one of the world's poorest
nations. I am married to a black American who
carries within her the blood of slaves and
slaveowners &endash; an inheritance we pass on to
our two precious daughters. I have brothers,
sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of
every race and every hue, scattered across three
continents, and for as long as I live, I will never
forget that in no other country on Earth is my
story even possible.
It's a story that hasn't made me the most
conventional candidate. But it is a story that has
seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this
nation is more than the sum of its parts &endash;
that out of many, we are truly one.
Throughout the first year of this
campaign, against all predictions to the contrary,
we saw how hungry the American people were for this
message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my
candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won
commanding victories in states with some of the
whitest populations in the country. In South
Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies,
we built a powerful coalition of African Americans
and white Americans.
This is not to say that race has not been
an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the
campaign, some commentators have deemed me either
"too black" or "not black enough." We saw racial
tensions bubble to the surface during the week
before the South Carolina primary. The press has
scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of
racial polarization, not just in terms of white and
black, but black and brown as well.
And yet, it has only been in the last
couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this
campaign has taken a particularly divisive
turn.
On one end of the spectrum, we've heard
the implication that my candidacy is somehow an
exercise in affirmative action; that it's based
solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to
purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the
other end, we've heard my former pastor, Reverend
Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express
views that have the potential not only to widen the
racial divide, but views that denigrate both the
greatness and the goodness of our nation; that
rightly offend white and black alike.
I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms,
the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused
such controversy. For some, nagging questions
remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce
critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of
course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could
be considered controversial while I sat in church?
Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his
political views? Absolutely &endash; just as I'm
sure many of you have heard remarks from your
pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly
disagreed.
But the remarks that have caused this recent
firestorm weren't simply controversial. They
weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak
out against perceived injustice. Instead, they
expressed a profoundly distorted view of this
country &endash; a view that sees white racism as
endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with
America above all that we know is right with
America; a view that sees the conflicts in the
Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of
stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating
from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical
Islam.
As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not
only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we
need unity; racially charged at a time when we need
to come together to solve a set of monumental
problems &endash; two wars, a terrorist threat, a
falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and
potentially devastating climate change; problems
that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian,
but rather problems that confront us all.
Given my background, my politics, and my
professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be
those for whom my statements of condemnation are
not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend
Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not
join another church? And I confess that if all that
I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of
those sermons that have run in an endless loop on
the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United
Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being
peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt
that I would react in much the same way
But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of
the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago
is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian
faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations
to love one another; to care for the sick and lift
up the poor. He is a man who served his country as
a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some
of the finest universities and seminaries in the
country, and who for over thirty years led a church
that serves the community by doing God's work here
on Earth &endash; by housing the homeless,
ministering to the needy, providing day care
services and scholarships and prison ministries,
and reaching out to those suffering from
HIV/AIDS.
In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I
described the experience of my first service at
Trinity:
"People began to shout, to rise from their seats
and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the
reverend's voice up into the rafters
.And in
that single note &endash; hope! &endash; I heard
something else; at the foot of that cross, inside
the thousands of churches across the city, I
imagined the stories of ordinary black people
merging with the stories of David and Goliath,
Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion's
den, Ezekiel's field of dry bones. Those stories
&endash; of survival, and freedom, and hope
&endash; became our story, my story; the blood that
had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears;
until this black church, on this bright day, seemed
once more a vessel carrying the story of a people
into future generations and into a larger world.
Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and
universal, black and more than black; in
chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave
us a means to reclaim memories that we didn't need
to feel shame about
memories that all people
might study and cherish &endash; and with which we
could start to rebuild."
That has been my experience at Trinity. Like
other predominantly black churches across the
country, Trinity embodies the black community in
its entirety &endash; the doctor and the welfare
mom, the model student and the former gang-banger.
Like other black churches, Trinity's services are
full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor.
They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and
shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained
ear. The church contains in full the kindness and
cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking
ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love
and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the
black experience in America.
And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship
with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he
has been like family to me. He strengthened my
faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my
children. Not once in my conversations with him
have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in
derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he
interacted with anything but courtesy and respect.
He contains within him the contradictions &endash;
the good and the bad &endash; of the community that
he has served diligently for so many years.
I can no more disown him than I can disown the
black community. I can no more disown him than I
can my white grandmother &endash; a woman who
helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and
again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she
loves anything in this world, but a woman who once
confessed her fear of black men who passed by her
on the street, and who on more than one occasion
has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made
me cringe.
These people are a part of me. And they are a
part of America, this country that I love.
Some will see this as an attempt to justify or
excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can
assure you it is not. I suppose the politically
safe thing would be to move on from this episode
and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We
can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a
demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine
Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements,
as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.
Understanding this reality requires a reminder
of how we arrived at this point. As William
Faulkner once wrote, "The past isn't dead and
buried. In fact, it isn't even past." We do not
need to recite here the history of racial injustice
in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves
that so many of the disparities that exist in the
African-American community today can be directly
traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier
generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of
slavery and Jim Crow.
Segregated schools were, and are, inferior
schools; we still haven't fixed them, fifty years
after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior
education they provided, then and now, helps
explain the pervasive achievement gap between
today's black and white students.
Legalized discrimination - where blacks were
prevented, often through violence, from owning
property, or loans were not granted to
African-American business owners, or black
homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or
blacks were excluded from unions, or the police
force, or fire departments &endash; meant that
black families could not amass any meaningful
wealth to bequeath to future generations. That
history helps explain the wealth and income gap
between black and white, and the concentrated
pockets of poverty that persists in so many of
today's urban and rural communities.
A lack of economic opportunity among black men,
and the shame and frustration that came from not
being able to provide for one's family, contributed
to the erosion of black families &endash; a problem
that welfare policies for many years may have
worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many
urban black neighborhoods &endash; parks for kids
to play in, police walking the beat, regular
garbage pick-up and building code enforcement
&endash; all helped create a cycle of violence,
blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.
This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and
other African-Americans of his generation grew up.
They came of age in the late fifties and early
sixties, a time when segregation was still the law
of the land and opportunity was systematically
constricted. What's remarkable is not how many
failed in the face of discrimination, but rather
how many men and women overcame the odds; how many
were able to make a way out of no way for those
like me who would come after them.
But for all those who scratched and clawed their
way to get a piece of the American Dream, there
were many who didn't make it &endash; those who
were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by
discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on
to future generations &endash; those young men and
increasingly young women who we see standing on
street corners or languishing in our prisons,
without hope or prospects for the future. Even for
those blacks who did make it, questions of race,
and racism, continue to define their worldview in
fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend
Wright's generation, the memories of humiliation
and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the
anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger
may not get expressed in public, in front of white
co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice
in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At
times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to
gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for
a politician's own failings.
And occasionally it finds voice in the church on
Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The
fact that so many people are surprised to hear that
anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply
reminds us of the old truism that the most
segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday
morning. That anger is not always productive;
indeed, all too often it distracts attention from
solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely
facing our own complicity in our condition, and
prevents the African-American community from
forging the alliances it needs to bring about real
change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and
to simply wish it away, to condemn it without
understanding its roots, only serves to widen the
chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the
races.
In fact, a similar anger exists within segments
of the white community. Most working- and
middle-class white Americans don't feel that they
have been particularly privileged by their race.
Their experience is the immigrant experience
&endash; as far as they're concerned, no one's
handed them anything, they've built it from
scratch. They've worked hard all their lives, many
times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or
their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor.
They are anxious about their futures, and feel
their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant
wages and global competition, opportunity comes to
be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams
come at my expense. So when they are told to bus
their children to a school across town; when they
hear that an African American is getting an
advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good
college because of an injustice that they
themselves never committed; when they're told that
their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are
somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over
time.
Like the anger within the black community, these
resentments aren't always expressed in polite
company. But they have helped shape the political
landscape for at least a generation. Anger over
welfare and affirmative action helped forge the
Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited
fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk
show hosts and conservative commentators built
entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism
while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial
injustice and inequality as mere political
correctness or reverse racism.
Just as black anger often proved
counterproductive, so have these white resentments
distracted attention from the real culprits of the
middle class squeeze &endash; a corporate culture
rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting
practices, and short-term greed; a Washington
dominated by lobbyists and special interests;
economic policies that favor the few over the many.
And yet, to wish away the resentments of white
Americans, to label them as misguided or even
racist, without recognizing they are grounded in
legitimate concerns &endash; this too widens the
racial divide, and blocks the path to
understanding.
This is where we are right now. It's a racial
stalemate we've been stuck in for years. Contrary
to the claims of some of my critics, black and
white, I have never been so naïve as to
believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions
in a single election cycle, or with a single
candidacy &endash; particularly a candidacy as
imperfect as my own.
But I have asserted a firm conviction &endash; a
conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith
in the American people &endash; that working
together we can move beyond some of our old racial
wounds, and that in fact we have no choice if we
are to continue on the path of a more perfect
union.
For the African-American community, that path
means embracing the burdens of our past without
becoming victims of our past. It means continuing
to insist on a full measure of justice in every
aspect of American life. But it also means binding
our particular grievances &endash; for better
health care, and better schools, and better jobs -
to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the
white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling,
the white man who's been laid off, the immigrant
trying to feed his family. And it means taking full
responsibility for own lives &endash; by demanding
more from our fathers, and spending more time with
our children, and reading to them, and teaching
them that while they may face challenges and
discrimination in their own lives, they must never
succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always
believe that they can write their own destiny.
Ironically, this quintessentially American
&endash; and yes, conservative &endash; notion of
self-help found frequent expression in Reverend
Wright's sermons. But what my former pastor too
often failed to understand is that embarking on a
program of self-help also requires a belief that
society can change.
The profound mistake of Reverend Wright's
sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our
society. It's that he spoke as if our society was
static; as if no progress has been made; as if this
country &endash; a country that has made it
possible for one of his own members to run for the
highest office in the land and build a coalition of
white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor,
young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a
tragic past. But what we know -- what we have seen
&endash; is that America can change. That is true
genius of this nation. What we have already
achieved gives us hope &endash; the audacity to
hope &endash; for what we can and must achieve
tomorrow.
In the white community, the path to a more
perfect union means acknowledging that what ails
the African-American community does not just exist
in the minds of black people; that the legacy of
discrimination - and current incidents of
discrimination, while less overt than in the past -
are real and must be addressed. Not just with
words, but with deeds &endash; by investing in our
schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil
rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal
justice system; by providing this generation with
ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for
previous generations. It requires all Americans to
realize that your dreams do not have to come at the
expense of my dreams; that investing in the health,
welfare, and education of black and brown and white
children will ultimately help all of America
prosper.
In the end, then, what is called for is nothing
more, and nothing less, than what all the world's
great religions demand &endash; that we do unto
others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be
our brother's keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be
our sister's keeper. Let us find that common stake
we all have in one another, and let our politics
reflect that spirit as well.
For we have a choice in this country. We can
accept a politics that breeds division, and
conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as
spectacle &endash; as we did in the OJ trial
&endash; or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in
the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the
nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright's sermons
on every channel, every day and talk about them
from now until the election, and make the only
question in this campaign whether or not the
American people think that I somehow believe or
sympathize with his most offensive words. We can
pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as
evidence that she's playing the race card, or we
can speculate on whether white men will all flock
to John McCain in the general election regardless
of his policies.
We can do that.
But if we do, I can tell you that in the next
election, we'll be talking about some other
distraction. And then another one. And then another
one. And nothing will change.
That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this
election, we can come together and say, "Not this
time." This time we want to talk about the
crumbling schools that are stealing the future of
black children and white children and Asian
children and Hispanic children and Native American
children. This time we want to reject the cynicism
that tells us that these kids can't learn; that
those kids who don't look like us are somebody
else's problem. The children of America are not
those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let
them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not
this time.
This time we want to talk about how the lines in
the Emergency Room are filled with whites and
blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care;
who don't have the power on their own to overcome
the special interests in Washington, but who can
take them on if we do it together.
This time we want to talk about the shuttered
mills that once provided a decent life for men and
women of every race, and the homes for sale that
once belonged to Americans from every religion,
every region, every walk of life. This time we want
to talk about the fact that the real problem is not
that someone who doesn't look like you might take
your job; it's that the corporation you work for
will ship it overseas for nothing more than a
profit.
This time we want to talk about the men and
women of every color and creed who serve together,
and fight together, and bleed together under the
same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring
them home from a war that never should've been
authorized and never should've been waged, and we
want to talk about how we'll show our patriotism by
caring for them, and their families, and giving
them the benefits they have earned.
I would not be running for President if I didn't
believe with all my heart that this is what the
vast majority of Americans want for this country.
This union may never be perfect, but generation
after generation has shown that it can always be
perfected. And today, whenever I find myself
feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility,
what gives me the most hope is the next generation
&endash; the young people whose attitudes and
beliefs and openness to change have already made
history in this election.
There is one story in particularly that I'd like
to leave you with today &endash; a story I told
when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr.
King's birthday at his home church, Ebenezer
Baptist, in Atlanta.
There is a young, twenty-three year old white
woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our
campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been
working to organize a mostly African-American
community since the beginning of this campaign, and
one day she was at a roundtable discussion where
everyone went around telling their story and why
they were there.
And Ashley said that when she was nine years
old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to
miss days of work, she was let go and lost her
health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and
that's when Ashley decided that she had to do
something to help her mom.
She knew that food was one of their most
expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother
that what she really liked and really wanted to eat
more than anything else was mustard and relish
sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to
eat.
She did this for a year until her mom got
better, and she told everyone at the roundtable
that the reason she joined our campaign was so that
she could help the millions of other children in
the country who want and need to help their parents
too.
Now Ashley might have made a different choice.
Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the
source of her mother's problems were blacks who
were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics
who were coming into the country illegally. But she
didn't. She sought out allies in her fight against
injustice.
Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes
around the room and asks everyone else why they're
supporting the campaign. They all have different
stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific
issue. And finally they come to this elderly black
man who's been sitting there quietly the entire
time. And Ashley asks him why he's there. And he
does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say
health care or the economy. He does not say
education or the war. He does not say that he was
there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to
everyone in the room, "I am here because of
Ashley."
"I'm here because of Ashley." By itself,
that single moment of recognition between that
young white girl and that old black man is not
enough. It is not enough to give health care to the
sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our
children.
But it is where we start. It is where our
union grows stronger. And as so many generations
have come to realize over the course of the
two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of
patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that
is where the perfection begins.
Back
to Reporter Home Page
|